Match statistics snapshot
- Feralpisalo fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 305Lead | Accurate passes | 277 |
| 377Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |