Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.72 vs 2.00, Δ 0.28).
- Inter fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Inter held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.00Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 256 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 506Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.19 | Goals prevented | 0.19 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |