Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa created the clearer chances on xG (2.23 vs 0.88, Δ 1.35).
- Pisa fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Lecce was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 2.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 6 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 309Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 396Lead | Total passes | 285 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.54 | Goals prevented | 0.54 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Lecce |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |