Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa created the clearer chances on xG (2.50 vs 1.32, Δ 1.18).
- Palermo fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32 |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 384Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 416 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Pisa | Statistic | Palermo |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Free Kicks | 10Lead |