Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Parma was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 13%).
- Pisa held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 453Lead | Accurate passes | 287 |
| 516Lead | Total passes | 351 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |