Match statistics snapshot
- Pisa created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.18, Δ 0.34).
- Pisa fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Pisa held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 337Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 418Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.06 | Goals prevented | 0.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.