Match statistics snapshot
- Sassuolo created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 2.26, Δ 1.20).
- Sassuolo fired more attempts (21 vs 15 shots).
- Pisa was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Pisa | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.26Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Pisa | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 354Lead | Accurate passes | 293 |
| 443Lead | Total passes | 371 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Pisa | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Pisa | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.47 | Goals prevented | 0.47 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Pisa | Statistic | Sassuolo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |