Match statistics snapshot
- Piteå W created the clearer chances on xG (0.94 vs 0.73, Δ 0.21).
- AIK fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Piteå W was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 305Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 421Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |