Match statistics snapshot
- Piteå W created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 1.05, Δ 0.72).
- Piteå W fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Djurgården held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 402Lead |
| 296 | Total passes | 521Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Djurgården |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |