Match statistics snapshot
- Häcken W created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 1.10, Δ 0.35).
- Häcken W fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Häcken W was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 137 | Accurate passes | 498Lead |
| 234 | Total passes | 613Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |