Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby fired more attempts (4 vs 3 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Hammarby held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Shots off target | 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
| 3 | Total shots | 4Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |
Additional tracked metrics for this fixture.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Free Kicks | 0 |