Match statistics snapshot
- Piteå W created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 1.43, Δ 0.19).
- Malmö FF W fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Malmö FF W was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 519Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Malmö Ff W |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |