Match statistics snapshot
- Piteå W created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.62, Δ 0.24).
- Piteå W fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- Rosengård W was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |
Statistics is not available yet.