Match statistics snapshot
- Piteå W created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 0.97, Δ 0.51).
- Piteå W fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- Piteå W was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 190 | Accurate passes | 262Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 358Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Piteå W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |