Match statistics snapshot
- Reading created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 2.71, Δ 1.50).
- Reading fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Plymouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.71Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Plymouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Plymouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Plymouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Plymouth | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.