Match statistics snapshot
- Plzen created the clearer chances on xG (3.76 vs 0.33, Δ 3.43).
- Plzen fired more attempts (28 vs 8 shots).
- Plzen was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Plzen | Statistic | Fc Astana |
|---|---|---|
| 3.76Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Plzen | Statistic | Fc Astana |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 227 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Plzen | Statistic | Fc Astana |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Plzen | Statistic | Fc Astana |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Plzen | Statistic | Fc Astana |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.