Match statistics snapshot
- Karviná created the clearer chances on xG (2.32 vs 2.36, Δ 0.04).
- Karviná was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Plzen | Statistic | Karviná |
|---|---|---|
| 2.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.36Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 10Lead |
| 9 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Plzen | Statistic | Karviná |
|---|---|---|
| Ball possession | ||
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Plzen | Statistic | Karviná |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Plzen | Statistic | Karviná |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Plzen | Statistic | Karviná |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |