Match statistics snapshot
- Port FC fired more attempts (28 vs 9 shots).
- Port FC was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 22%).
- Port FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Port Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 23Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 13Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 28Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Port Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 291 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 407Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Port Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Port Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Port Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |