Match statistics snapshot
- Trat FC fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Trat FC was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 240 | Accurate passes | 273Lead |
| 312 | Total passes | 339Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Police Tero | Statistic | Trat Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.