Match statistics snapshot
- Polokwane City fired more attempts (5 vs 3 shots).
- Polokwane City was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 0%).
- Chippa United held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 104 | Accurate passes | 133Lead |
| 155 | Total passes | 185Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.