Match statistics snapshot
- Polokwane City fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Stellenbosch was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 30%).
- Stellenbosch held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 198 | Accurate passes | 369Lead |
| 291 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Polokwane City | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |