Match statistics snapshot
- Ponte Preta fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Ponte Preta was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
- Amazonas held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 478Lead |
| 413 | Total passes | 552Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.