Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.81, Δ 0.46).
- Ponte Preta fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Chapecoense-sc was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.81Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 304Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 375Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.