Match statistics snapshot
- Ponte Preta created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 0.62, Δ 0.98).
- Ponte Preta fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Ponte Preta was more accurate in front of goal (10% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Sampaio Correa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Sampaio Correa |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 305Lead | Accurate passes | 186 |
| 401Lead | Total passes | 283 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Sampaio Correa |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Sampaio Correa |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Sampaio Correa |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Fouls | 26 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.