Match statistics snapshot
- Vitoria created the clearer chances on xG (0.23 vs 2.58, Δ 2.35).
- Vitoria fired more attempts (22 vs 4 shots).
- Ponte Preta was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 0.23 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.58Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 27% | Ball possession | 73%Lead |
| 55% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 106 | Accurate passes | 429Lead |
| 194 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ponte Preta | Statistic | Vitoria |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.