Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Port Vale was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 24%).
- AFC Wimbledon held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 69%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 257Lead |
| 303 | Total passes | 375Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |