Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 10%).
- Port Vale held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5Lead |
| 4 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 235Lead | Accurate passes | 229 |
| 365Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |