Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 2.71, Δ 1.85).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Port Vale was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.71Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 299Lead | Accurate passes | 226 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |