Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Lincoln was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 40%).
- Port Vale held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 440Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 558Lead | Total passes | 390 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |