Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 1.46, Δ 0.01).
- Peterborough fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Peterborough was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 201 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 265 | Total passes | 456Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Fouls | 2Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.