Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Port Vale was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 20%).
- Reading held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 321Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 410Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |