Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 1.25, Δ 0.53).
- Rotherham fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 55% | Pass accuracy | 66%Lead |
| 165 | Accurate passes | 224Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 340Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.