Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale fired more attempts (20 vs 3 shots).
- Wolves U21 was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 30%).
- Port Vale held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 517Lead | Accurate passes | 323 |
| 600Lead | Total passes | 407 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Port Vale | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.