Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (0.85 vs 2.05, Δ 1.20).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Casa Pia held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.85 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 260 | Accurate passes | 325Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.