Match statistics snapshot
- Portimonense fired more attempts (23 vs 10 shots).
- Penafiel was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Penafiel |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 11Lead |
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Penafiel |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 267Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 342Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Penafiel |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Penafiel |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portimonense | Statistic | Penafiel |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.