Match statistics snapshot
- Bay FC fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Portland Thorns W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 343 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 428 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |