Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Thorns W fired more attempts (22 vs 14 shots).
- Houston Dash W was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 23%).
- Portland Thorns W held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 347Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 469Lead | Total passes | 402 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Thorns W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |