Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (24 vs 6 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Portland Timbers held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 452Lead | Accurate passes | 259 |
| 532Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.