Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- Portland Timbers held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 531Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 616Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.