Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 1.22, Δ 0.68).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 304 | Accurate passes | 471Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 538Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.