Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (3.65 vs 1.01, Δ 2.64).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (23 vs 11 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 3.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 589Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 685Lead | Total passes | 276 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 1.30 | Goals prevented | 1.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.