Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 2.25, Δ 0.75).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.25Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 231 | Accurate passes | 448Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 519Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.