Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 2.03, Δ 1.23).
- DC United fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.03Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 233 | Accurate passes | 358Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 474Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |