Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.34, Δ 1.13).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.34 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 359 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |