Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 1.83, Δ 0.02).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- FC Dallas held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.83 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 18 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 396 | Accurate passes | 440Lead |
| 469 | Total passes | 527Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
| 1.65 | Goals prevented | 1.65 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |