Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 1.20, Δ 1.07).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 514Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 606Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |