Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles FC created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 2.70, Δ 0.43).
- Los Angeles FC fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Los Angeles FC was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.70Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 513Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 583Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.05 | Goals prevented | -1.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |