Match statistics snapshot
- Los Angeles Galaxy created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 0.99, Δ 0.01).
- Los Angeles Galaxy fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Los Angeles Galaxy was more accurate in front of goal (24% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 511Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 593Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Los Angeles Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |