Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (2.83 vs 2.19, Δ 0.64).
- Portland Timbers fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.19 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 468Lead | Accurate passes | 405 |
| 530Lead | Total passes | 466 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.54 | Goals prevented | -0.54 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |