Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.59 vs 1.41, Δ 0.18).
- San Diego fired more attempts (21 vs 11 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 1.59Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.41 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 266 | Accurate passes | 677Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 741Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.21 | Goals prevented | -1.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Portland Timbers | Statistic | San Diego |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |